Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time

crazyindianstranger
Senior Registered Member
Senior Registered Member
Posts: 897
Joined: 11 Nov 2014, 11:51 am
Location: India
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by crazyindianstranger »

May be I could be wrong as these are my personal observations...
I m not any expert in this filed, still trying to learn how CS works....
The real fun is in doing experiments, not in watching the crap programmes!!!!!
moonji54
Gold Contributor
Gold Contributor
Posts: 1178
Joined: 25 Jun 2014, 10:04 am
Location: Dubai,UAE
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by moonji54 »

yes brother, oscam i have tried in china base receivers. i have observed the same with multiple lines in oscam. i think it pick the fastest ecm from multiple lines. with me before the oscam was very fast but not unable to open fake encryption channels. i will try oscam again and hope to get maximum result. actually right now issue is dish tv and hotbird 13e, in same emulator not able to open both satellites with same response. hope in oscam will provide desired response.
SAMSUNG QLED Q80R 55" Smart tv
FreeSat GTC 4K Android Receiver
Apple tv 4K, Amazon FireStick 4K
Kodi expert
108e,95e,105.5e
User avatar
Golden
Vip
Vip
Posts: 4633
Joined: 14 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Location: Pakistan
Has thanked: 1280 times
Been thanked: 653 times

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by Golden »

moonji54 wrote:yes brother, oscam i have tried in china base receivers.
with me before the oscam was very fast but not unable to open fake encryption channels.
oscam itself is disabled to judge its base. it can't recognize whether its been used in china or korea made receivers :lol1:
those encryptions about which you are talking about don't respond because you were using old build of oscam.
use 1.20 mips then you'll see the satisfactory results on Avril's service.
User avatar
Golden
Vip
Vip
Posts: 4633
Joined: 14 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Location: Pakistan
Has thanked: 1280 times
Been thanked: 653 times

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by Golden »

crazyindianstranger wrote:Oscam handles multiple servers better because in load balancing mode 1 it always selects the fastest server no matter in which order the proxies are set in the oscam.server file, & has less freeze whenever it switches proxies...
If service or ident are present, ECM requests for the assigned readers are always implemented.
lb_mode=1, the weight for a reader is divided by the average response time of requests sent to the reader, i.e. lower average response time means higher priority. but upon zapping of several channels using multiple servers load balancing 'll block server's incoming requests for limited time of span !!!
crazyindianstranger
Senior Registered Member
Senior Registered Member
Posts: 897
Joined: 11 Nov 2014, 11:51 am
Location: India
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by crazyindianstranger »

Golden wrote:try these setting by using just single service (Avril) = cardshare-discussion/avril-lavigne-wica ... ml#p147248
your said problem should be gone away.
Hi bro, (sorry 4 the delayed reply, I was out of my station).

Tried the given configuration exactly as provided with single reader. Other newcamd readers are working OK with this configuration individually too. But now see the log 4 Avril line (Line working in Wicardd):

2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (main) Stb boxtype = ini-1000sv
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (main) creating pidfile /tmp/.oscam/oscam.pid with pid 762
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (config) userdb reloaded: 1 accounts loaded, 0 expired, 0 disabled
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (main) signal handling initialized
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] creating thread for device mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (stat) loadbalancer: can't read from file /tmp/.oscam/stat
2015/05/29 07:42:28 563CF0 p (newcamd) proxy mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455 newcamd525 (fd=0)
2015/05/29 07:42:28 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] proxy initialized, server mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (emmcache) loading emmcache disabled since no reader is using it!
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (emmcache) loading emmstats disabled since no reader is using it!
2015/05/29 07:42:28 0 s (anticasc) anti cascading disabled
2015/05/29 07:42:28 5642E0 c (client) plain dvbapi-client granted (saini, au=off)
2015/05/29 07:42:28 5642E0 c (dvbapi) dvbapi channelcache loaded from /usr/keys/oscam_atv/oscam.ccache
2015/05/29 07:42:28 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Detected /dev/dvb/adapter0/demux0 Api: 0, userconfig boxtype: 1
2015/05/29 07:42:28 77100468 h (webif) webif: decompressed 159579 bytes back into 381416 bytes
2015/05/29 07:42:28 77100468 h (webif) HTTP Server running. ip=0.0.0.0 port=8888
2015/05/29 07:42:28 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net: resolved ip=182.176.98.157
2015/05/29 07:42:28 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] connecting to mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455
2015/05/29 07:42:31 563CF0 p (newcamd) Newcamd Server: mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455 - UserID: 2
2015/05/29 07:42:31 563CF0 p (newcamd) CAID: 0000 - UA: 0000000000000000 - Provider # 1
2015/05/29 07:42:31 563CF0 p (newcamd) Provider ID: 000000 - SA: 00000000
2015/05/29 07:42:31 563CF0 p (newcamd) Connection closed to remote server
2015/05/29 07:42:31 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] disconnected: reason disconnect on receive
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 ecmpid 0 CAID: 4AE0 ECM_PID: 0C43 PROVID: 000001
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 ecmpid 1 CAID: 4AE0 ECM_PID: 0C44 PROVID: 000000
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 ecmpid 2 CAID: 0B00 ECM_PID: 0C44 PROVID: 000000
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 skipped stream CAID: 4AE0 ECM_PID: 0C44 PROVID: 000000 (Same as ECMPID 1)
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 found 3 ECMpids and 7 STREAMpids in PMT
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 serving srvid 8185 (4AE0:8185 unknown) on adapter 0000 camask 0001 index 0000 pmtpid 0C40
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 found channel in cache and matching prio -> start descrambling ecmpid 2
2015/05/29 07:42:32 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 trying to descramble PID 2 CAID 0B00 PROVID 000000 ECMPID 0C44 ANY CHID PMTPID 0C40 VPID 0C41
2015/05/29 07:42:33 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] connecting to mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455
2015/05/29 07:42:36 563CF0 p (newcamd) Newcamd Server: mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455 - UserID: 2
2015/05/29 07:42:36 563CF0 p (newcamd) CAID: 0000 - UA: 0000000000000000 - Provider # 1
2015/05/29 07:42:36 563CF0 p (newcamd) Provider ID: 000000 - SA: 00000000
2015/05/29 07:42:36 563CF0 p (newcamd) Connection closed to remote server
2015/05/29 07:42:36 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] disconnected: reason disconnect on receive
2015/05/29 07:42:38 5642E0 c (ecm) saini (0B00&000000/0000/8185/67:CB66AC009D599AFF8D5356DFB8B675EF): timeout (5002 ms) by mgcamdreceiver
2015/05/29 07:42:38 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] connecting to mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455
2015/05/29 07:42:40 563CF0 p (newcamd) Newcamd Server: mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455 - UserID: 2
2015/05/29 07:42:40 563CF0 p (newcamd) CAID: 0000 - UA: 0000000000000000 - Provider # 1
2015/05/29 07:42:40 563CF0 p (newcamd) Provider ID: 000000 - SA: 00000000
2015/05/29 07:42:40 563CF0 p (newcamd) Connection closed to remote server
2015/05/29 07:42:40 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] disconnected: reason disconnect on receive
2015/05/29 07:42:43 5642E0 c (ecm) saini (0B00&000000/0000/8185/67:CB66AC009D599AFF8D5356DFB8B675EF): timeout (5003 ms) by mgcamdreceiver
2015/05/29 07:42:43 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 restarting decodingrequests after 1 ms with 1 enabled and 2 disabled ecmpids!
2015/05/29 07:42:43 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 trying to descramble PID 2 CAID 0B00 PROVID 000000 ECMPID 0C44 ANY CHID PMTPID 0C40 VPID 0C41
2015/05/29 07:42:48 5642E0 c (ecm) saini (0B00&000000/0000/8185/67:CB66AC009D599AFF8D5356DFB8B675EF): timeout (5002 ms) by mgcamdreceiver
2015/05/29 07:42:48 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] connecting to mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455
2015/05/29 07:42:48 5642E0 c (ecm) saini (0B00&000000/0000/8185/67:AAC51FF8171864BCD23FAB132C7CB2B6): timeout (5005 ms) by mgcamdreceiver
2015/05/29 07:42:48 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 restarting decodingrequests after 1 ms with 1 enabled and 2 disabled ecmpids!
2015/05/29 07:42:48 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 trying to descramble PID 2 CAID 0B00 PROVID 000000 ECMPID 0C44 ANY CHID PMTPID 0C40 VPID 0C41
2015/05/29 07:42:50 563CF0 p (newcamd) Newcamd Server: mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455 - UserID: 2
2015/05/29 07:42:50 563CF0 p (newcamd) CAID: 0000 - UA: 0000000000000000 - Provider # 1
2015/05/29 07:42:50 563CF0 p (newcamd) Provider ID: 000000 - SA: 00000000
2015/05/29 07:42:51 563CF0 p (newcamd) Connection closed to remote server
2015/05/29 07:42:51 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] disconnected: reason disconnect on receive
2015/05/29 07:42:53 5642E0 c (ecm) saini (0B00&000000/0000/8185/67:AAC51FF8171864BCD23FAB132C7CB2B6): timeout (5001 ms) by mgcamdreceiver
2015/05/29 07:42:54 5642E0 c (ecm) saini (0B00&000000/0000/8185/67:AAC51FF8171864BCD23FAB132C7CB2B6): timeout (5002 ms) by mgcamdreceiver
2015/05/29 07:42:54 5642E0 c (ecm) saini (0B00&000000/0000/8185/67:AAC51FF8171864BCD23FAB132C7CB2B6): not found (513 ms) by mgcamdreceiver
2015/05/29 07:42:54 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 restarting decodingrequests after 1 ms with 1 enabled and 2 disabled ecmpids!
2015/05/29 07:42:54 5642E0 c (dvbapi) Demuxer 0 trying to descramble PID 2 CAID 0B00 PROVID 000000 ECMPID 0C44 ANY CHID PMTPID 0C40 VPID 0C41
2015/05/29 07:42:54 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] connecting to mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455
2015/05/29 07:42:56 563CF0 p (newcamd) Newcamd Server: mgcamdreceiver.ddns.net:22455 - UserID: 2
2015/05/29 07:42:56 563CF0 p (newcamd) CAID: 0000 - UA: 0000000000000000 - Provider # 1
2015/05/29 07:42:56 563CF0 p (newcamd) Provider ID: 000000 - SA: 00000000
2015/05/29 07:42:57 563CF0 p (newcamd) Connection closed to remote server
2015/05/29 07:42:57 563CF0 p (reader) mgcamdreceiver [newcamd] disconnected: reason disconnect on receive
The real fun is in doing experiments, not in watching the crap programmes!!!!!
User avatar
Golden
Vip
Vip
Posts: 4633
Joined: 14 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Location: Pakistan
Has thanked: 1280 times
Been thanked: 653 times

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by Golden »

one valid reason can be that if your internet connection is very loaded at times then you 'll get "disconnected: reason disconnect on receive" msg in your logs.
crazyindianstranger
Senior Registered Member
Senior Registered Member
Posts: 897
Joined: 11 Nov 2014, 11:51 am
Location: India
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by crazyindianstranger »

Golden wrote:one valid reason can be that if your internet connection is very loaded at times then you 'll get "disconnected: reason disconnect on receive" msg in your logs.
I thought so, but can't understand, Wicardd is working fine over the same internet connection & handshaking every proxie immediately...

Does Oscam needs more bandwidth to connect to newcamd based proxies?
The real fun is in doing experiments, not in watching the crap programmes!!!!!
User avatar
Golden
Vip
Vip
Posts: 4633
Joined: 14 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Location: Pakistan
Has thanked: 1280 times
Been thanked: 653 times

Re: Oscam Vs Wicardd reader/proxie connection time



Post by Golden »

crazyindianstranger wrote: Does Oscam needs more bandwidth to connect to newcamd based proxies?
how can oscam consume bandwidth without sharing clients or exchange psychology.
actually oscam needs reserved space at the time of asking DCW.
due to a loaded Internet line' oscam 'll get "reason disconnect on receive" hence log these lines in your file.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: User avatarApple, No User AvatarClaude, No User AvatarDot, User avatarfacebook, User avatarGoogle Adsense and 1 guest