crazyindianstranger wrote:
No Special reasons to test in Oscam.
Just comparing the emulators to find the best.
Also I ve heard that Oscam is still actively developed. Development of other emu's isn't so active.
reason for asking you was that what are your findings between these two.
client adjustments are also very important to get benefits from wicardd and oscam.
crazyindianstranger wrote:
No Special reasons to test in Oscam.
Just comparing the emulators to find the best.
Also I ve heard that Oscam is still actively developed. Development of other emu's isn't so active.
reason for asking you was that what are your findings between these two.
client adjustments are also very important to get benefits from wicardd and oscam.
DEAR @Avril Lavigne....
PLZ GUIDE ME WHAT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MGCAMD, OSCAM AND WICCARD... AND ALSO TELL ME THE BENEFITS OF WICCARD???????
FARRUKH wrote:
yes bro wicardd is much faster than mgcamd. im using wicardd as cccam for long time. very good ecm with no freezing at all... jst like fta. ...
Remember That There Is Almost No Competitor To Mgcamd.
If We Can't Handle Mgcamd Then Its Not The Basic Fault Of That Emulator Itself.
Mgcamd Can Be Called The King Of All Surrounding Emulators (Client Side) Including Oscam.
we have adjusted wicardd perfectly to deal with fake crypto.
99% of satellites have correct asking ecm data' so no fake asking in those particular sats.
so if anybody wanna get the perfect results on other satellites like 13 east then ADDITIONAL proper settings would be needed in wicardd configuration file.
otherwise normal users should use wicardd on fake systems to get results' and mgcamd emulator on remaining satellites like 13east, 9east, 7east and so n so.